Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Oklahomans on

Hunger

mobile:

Oklahomans on

Hunger

To truly understand hunger, we asked Oklahomans to speak for themselves.

Our recent voter poll captures more than opinions. It reflects lived experiences of hunger, rising food costs, and barriers to accessing affordable, reliable meals.

The findings are a human-centered picture of food insecurity in Oklahoma, challenging us to respond with seriousness and compassion to the growing need.

“Even now, with SNAP benefits, we usually have to go to the food bank once a month to make sure we have enough.” 

Torri, mom and SNAP participant

“Even now, with SNAP benefits, we usually have to go to the food bank once a month to make sure we have enough.” 

Torri, mom and SNAP participant

Checkmark icon
LinkedIn logo
Facebook logo
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo
Facebook logo
Instagram logo
73% Support increasing SNAP funding +
Nearly three out of four Oklahomans support increasing SNAP funding, reflecting broad public recognition that food assistance programs help families stay healthy and financially stable.

66% Oppose cuts to hunger programs +
Two-thirds of voters oppose reducing funding for hunger-related programs, signaling strong concern about the impact cuts could have on children, seniors, and working families.

77% Are more likely to support candidates prioritizing hunger reduction +
A strong majority of voters say they are more likely to support candidates who prioritize reducing hunger, showing that food security is not just a policy issue, but a political priority for many Oklahomans.
Checkmark icon

Checkmark icon
LinkedIn logo
Facebook logo
Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo
Facebook logo
Instagram logo

Steady work doesn't always mean stability.

Limited income affects 76% of those experiencing food insecurity. Sixty-five percent say they lack a job that pays well, and 61% face ongoing job insecurity.

Essential costs continue to rise.

Fifty-seven percent reported that high housing costs stretch resources thin, while 56% said being hit by unexpected household or healthcare expenses unravels their carefully calculated budget. For families with children, 44% also face high childcare costs, adding another layer to already stretched resources.

Food insecurity doesn’t happen in isolation.

The trade-offs become clear. Utility bills top the list, with 57% saying they make it harder to afford food. Housing follows at 42%, then transportation at 34%, and medical bills at 23%. Each demand represents a choice someone has had to make. A bill paid instead of groceries purchased. Everyday costs stack up, turning routine expenses into barriers between families and the food they need.

Checkmark icon

Top barriers to food resource access:

shame

embarrassment

transportation

lack of information

eligibility restrictions

fear

language difficulties

Top barriers to food resource access:

shame

embarrassment

transportation

lack of information

eligibility restrictions

fear

language difficulties

Checkmark icon

What Oklahomans Think About SNAP

95%
believe it’s important for SNAP users to access nutritious food
61%
say the average benefit ($2.07/meal) is not enough to combat hunger
90%
support incentives that increase access to fruits & vegetables
Checkmark icon

Working together for a hunger free Oklahoma.

To top